חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 694 • 'פרוייקט וירום העולמי' של בילי הדבילי • 29-03-2023

- - - לא מוגה! - - - 

‫‫‫‫‫‫‫

What else have the climate experts gotten wrong and how long have they been getting it wrong?

Well, fortunately, the competitive enterprises students done the research on this, and it turns out these people have been very wrong for a very long time.

1969,

the New York Times was printing climate hysteria from an expert called פול ארליק,

We must realize that unless we are extremely lucky,

everybody will disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years.

That was פול ארליק in 1969.

Well, here it is, 2023, and that same פול ארליק, who is down 90 and is still publishing books and is still being cited on 60 minutes,

he is still telling us that we are all going to die. Now, clearly,

פול ארליק had some sort of traumatic childhood,

he has been inflicted it on the rest of us

for over 50 years.

And for over 50 years,

his fellow experts have taken him seriously.

Now, back then, of course,

climate change didn't mean global warming, it meant a new ice age.

In 1970, the Boston Global report,

Scientists predicts a new ice age by 21st century.

According to the globe,

air pollution may obliterate the sun and cause a new ice age in the first third of the next century.

An ice age.

1972, Brown University's science department

said a letter to the White House explaining,

that they had deep concern with the future of the world.

Because this ice age falls within the rank of processes which produced the last ice age.

Two years later, 1974,

The Guardian reported that,

ספי סטיילייטים,

הבראו שה new ice age is coming fast.

And the report cited,

just for moral weight,

analysis carried out at Columbia University.

Then,

a few years later, 1977,

the actor לנרד נימויין,

who's not a science expert,

technically, but played one at one point on television,

shot this video.

We are unprepared for the next advanced.

The result could be hunger and death on a scale unprecedented in all of history.

What scientists are telling us now is that the threat of a nice age is not as remote as they once thought.

During the lifetime of our grandchildren,

ארקטיק cold and perpetual snow could turn most of the inevitable portions of our planet into a polarid desert.

Hunger and death on an unprecedented scale!

Someone else with a tragic child is already inflicted on the rest of us.

But in the early 1980s,

when the ice didn't arrive,

the experts decided the problem wasn't too much cold,

it was too much heat.

It was global warming.

In 1989, the Associated Press ran this story,

quote,

a senior UN environmental official said,

entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels,

if global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

In other words, 23 שנים לפני כן.

That's the last year,

1989,

קיימן אקספרט קודם ג'יימן האנסון מת עם הפורטר של סאלון.

אצל סאלון, האנסון אמר שבתוך 20 או 30 שנה,

ה-OECD,

שעומדים ב-2030 שנה,

תהיה בוועדה.

בוועדה.

אנחנו עשינו את זה היום,

ובאמת,

זה מתגשם,

אבל עכשיו עכשיו רגע.

אז במרץ של 2000,

the independent newspaper in a piece explaining that snow falls are now just a thing of the past.

And we're quoting,

snow is starting to disappear from our lives.

The piece quoted as an expert claiming that,

children children just aren't going to know what snow is.

No idea what snow is.

It'll be a relic,

not of the ice age,

but of the great inferno of global warming.

Then,

in 2004,

amazingly,

civilization still exist.

The guardian predicted,

to the quote, major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a Siberian climate by 2020,

which is a little confusing because

global warming doesn't typically produce a Siberian climate. And it was around this time that they decided,

hey,

we don't want to get pinned down in the details.

Will it be too hot?

Will it be too cold?

We don't want to say.

Something bad is going to happen, so we're going to call it climate change.

And that paved the way for Al Gore, who in 2006 released his famous documentary, An Inconvenient Truth.

And the beauty of an Inconvenient Truth is, now that it's been,

well, Inconvenient,

more than 15 years since it came out,

we can fact check it's claims.

Here's the trailer.

If you look at the 10 hottest years ever measured, they've all occurred in the last 14 years and the hottest of all was 2005. This is Patagonia 75 years ago and the same glacier today. This is Mount Kilimanjava 30 years ago and last year.

Within the decade there will be no more snow.

Algoor also said there would be no ice in the Arctic.

He quoted researchers, climate researchers, experts. And he explained that,

the North Pole will be ice free in the summer

by 2013 because of man-made global warming.

Now, it does take a certain level of chutzpה to make a prediction that precise and Algoor made many of them and all of them turned out to be wrong.

And for a normal person,

that would be a cue,

maybe it's time to retire.

I'm rich on Google stock, maybe I could just stop talking because of course I've been disgraced by my own foolish predictions. But no, he kept going.

And he was helped in that by the entire news media. It makes you wonder why.

News organizations exist to bring you the news, to assess whether the things are true or not. But if all of them callוד

to hide lying,

you have to ask,

is there something else going on here?

We'll let you decide. We do know that by 2006, NBC news informed the world that, quote,

a leading U.S. climate researcher says, the world has a 10-year window,

till 2016!

A window of opportunity to take decisive action on global warming and avort קטסטרפי.

And of course, by the predicted date,

Donald Trump became president, but that's not what they were predicting.

In 2008, the Associated Press reported,

according to a top NASA scientist,

in 5-10 years, the Arctic will be free of sea ice in the summer.

That didn't happen, but of course, no one ever held to account for bad predictions, so this kept going.

John Kerry!

Now, our climate זר,

cited that very same science in 2009. Watch.

You have sea ice, which is melting in the rate that the Arctic ocean now increasingly is exposed.

In five years,

a scientist predicts that we will have the first ice-free Arctic summer.

What's hilarious!

This guy has never had a job!

He's only been in politics. He's never done one useful thing. He's not a scientist.

He's actually not an expert, but because he's way more aggressive than you are,

and because he has access to the media, which amplify his claims,

he poses as one.

Now, what's strange about the prediction you just heard is that John

Uncary's prediction rocks! and if you not מכיר.

קיימן קודם מהקשר.

קודם כל מלחמה!

קודם כל מלחמת זה הוא לא מלחמת.

כי אנחנו יכולים לעלות על זה ולחמור על זה ולאחר אותנו על זה,

אז אני אשמח לך בטוח שבגנרות מעכשיו אנחנו יכולים לחזור ולאחמור על החיים שלנו.

קודם כולנו לחזור לגבי החיים!

This was the moment when the rise of the ocean began to slow and our planet began to heal

by 2014, the stature of liberty will soon be under water.

That man is a scientist.

And of course, climate does change, it has always changed. In fact, the landscape we live in now is formed by climate change.

The glaciers are a product of climate change. The climate is changing now, it never stops changing.

That is a process that we didn't cause and that we can't control,

to any great degree, we will never be able to control.

And there are upsides to it and downsides to it.

by the way,

if the earth is indeed getting warmer,

and it seems to be, well, then that will make more arable land in places like Canada and Northern Europe.

So כמו כל הדברים in this life, in the temporal world,

it's a mixed blessing, אבל you only hear the downside,

which tells you a lot.

It tells you this is not science, it's manipulation.

אלה לא רפורטים מהאקספורטים, אלה מערכים.

Founded by David Rockefeller,

the Trilateral Commission has been an arm of the global deep state since 1973.

Last week at their annual meeting,

a speaker who cannot be identified according to commission rules said that we are now in a period of structural inflation that will last for decades.

They said that the free market is over and industry now sets policy.

And they said that this year, 2023,

is year one of this new global order.

Days later,

the Federal Reserve Bank announces a July launch for their new FedNow Service,

which was first announced in October 2021. The too big to fail banks and all the large processors are already on board,

and so is the U.S. Treasury.

In the first week of April, the Federal Reserve. The FedNow is an instant payment processing system that seeks to be the base of all digital transactions,

acting as an umbrella company to manage all financial payments.

This has been shown. This has been shown to be the gateway to a central bank digital currency,

CBDC.

FedNow is much like the Reserve Bank of India's instant payments system,

the Unified payments interface or U.P.I. U.P.I. U.P.I. has had huge success in converting rural communities into a complete cashless society.

According to the International Monetary Fund, U.P.I.

ratioed, לקחתי את התכוס תכוס תלונה, והסדרו את ההשרות לתת כדי לבנה גדולות מדינות דיגיטליות בישראל נכנסו בנק-בת דיגיטליות.

ההתכויות לתאחריות בנימין-נטיאליות,

זה גם כאילו שמטרת רשימה בנגביהו של ניגד הסביב לקרוב הקטנים,

נכון,

שלי יפה אדברה,

גייטס הוא הנוגר שלהשתולוגיה של ה-W.

אחרי חינוך זה חינוך, חינוך גייטס,

כמו שמאז גרמני, כמו מדינות,

ביל גייטס גים יותר ממה של חינוך,

אוקיי. אבל הארצות היו הנוגעים הרבה זמן,

והם יכולים להיות

הרבה זמן מהחולה של חוץ מלח, אבל גייטס משתולוגיה לא רק מהביל-אמאלדות ל-G.A.C., אבל אני חושב שזה דבר רוטרי, ואני חושב שזה יעזור ל-CAPI ו-UNIS B.R.R.R. ל-O.אז אם אתה הזדמנות את כל הכל זה,

He's by far the big, he's a billion dollars a year.

And so now, this is his new idea going forward. After this big experiment failed and he admits those vaccines, he says, he says, those vaccines need to be fixed.

Here's what he's saying now.

In a set of two years, we should make it more like six months.

It's certainly,

you know, some of the standardized platform approaches, including MRNA,

would allow us to do that.

So, you know, it took us a lot longer this time than it should have.

So now he wants to get a new vaccine the next time something like this happens. He wants to get it out even faster.

What do you, would you have a response to that?

Well, here's the big, the very scary thing, Jimmy, is that,

you know, they've got all of these bio-labs now and they're,

you know, Gates and others are involved with this project called the Global Virum

Project.

where they're trying to collect samples samples of every virus in the world that can be weaponized.

And on,

פיטר דייסק was part of it U.S.A. I.D. And to create an archive and an inventories.

And then they're all working on, you know,

in 150 mile labs in the around the world, 40 of them in the Ukraine,

in China, in all over Africa,

they're working on MarberdVIRUS,

אבולה,

Zicca,

Mונקי-פוקס,

פוליו,

אתם יודעים,

כל מיני וירוסים אחרים שהם מנסים להתנות להם.

אז, אתם יודעים,

ועכשיו הם נותנים ל...

אורגנציה המשחקה,

זה מה שביידן עושה,

מיניות,

לתקרם אמצעות פנדמית עם איזה קריטרייה בכל זמן שהם רוצים.

אז הם יכולים להצליח, אם הם רוצים להצליח, הם יכולים להצליח את הוירוסים האלה, הם לא צריכים להצליח אותם,

והם פשוט יצליחו אמצעות.

וכאשר הם יצליחו אמצעות, אז הם יכולים להצליח לכל מיניות את הוירוסים האלה שהם מדברים עליהם על כל הווירוסים האלה שהם מדברים עליהם.

למי זה הרבה יותר רעיון אם אנחנו מתחילים לצליח

אי-אפשרות בלבד.

אתה יכול להקדם את הקפילה,

אבל,

אתה יודע, אם אתה מיוחד את הקונסטיטוציה,

יש באמת איזה שום דבר באמריקה,

ואי-אפשרות בלבד היא רק אי-אפשרות שלנו,

וזה חלק מהקונסטייה שלי,

שזה צמצום דבר רגשי יותר גרסיבה מאשר שזה יעשה על שבו,

אבל זה סיסטמטי שאם אתה מפליח על כל מיניות כאלה,

על קובי או על משפחות או על אוקראינה,

אתה תצליח לצליחות.

אתה תצליח לצליחות מהאינטרנט,

אם אתה דוקטור או סייאנטיסט

שהיו להם מדעים מדעי,

או אפילו אנשים,

כמו שאני הייתי סנסור על פרסומת גרינשוטים של

צוות סי-די-סיימטריות,

כמצביעים מיוחדים.

אתה יודע, זה מאוד בזוזר, אבל זה לגבי זה הכי מסורים,

כשאתה מתחיל להצליח לצליחות עם המחקרות הראשונה,

זה באמת מגיע על דמוקרטיה אמריקנית, כי אתה לא יכול לצליח דמוקרטיה בלי הפלילה של אינפורמייה, אתה פשוט לא יכול לצליח,

אי-אף אחד יכול לצליח את זה. אני חושב שאתה טוען,

אם אתה חושב שאתה צורך לצליחות את הפובליקה מבחינות חשובות,

אז אתה חושב בפובליקה,

בדימוס,

ואתה לא יכול לצליח לצליח את עצמך דמוקרטיה.