חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 911 • המדריך לשליטה בגלקסיה... • 22-02-2024

- - - לא מוגה! - - - 

צ'יפ פריס טאקס מיטינג אי-לוויש מרקדינג אינדאבר,

צ'ייניס-בקט אונליין סופרסטור טימו,

דרופים 21 מיליון דולרס על 3 סופרבול עדס זה העולה.

זאת אומרת,

15 מיליון דולרס בגיבה-אווייז.

זאת אומרת,

יש לי את ההעולה המרכז והמלכזי מגזרת וכלומרית גזרים,

ומונדאבר פתיחות תינצוות והאם לחכמים לדובר הדברים,

מדובר יותר על ההנחיות מהמשפחה בצד הדרך של מדיני סושיאל מיני סופרס אלו,

במייסופי פריסציה

ריקס-לי, תודה רבה לך להודות, ניסתור בבית הדובר,

ובכך,

בבקשה.

What way has social media been identified as an instrument of hybrid warfare?

First of all, people have to understand what is a social media platform. Whether it's developed by ByteDance,

TicToc, which is the parent company of TicToc, or Facebook and Instagram, which is developed by Meta.

These companies are in the information trafficking business.

A single intrusive app enables the developer to conduct an audio,

video and physical surveillance on the end user, because the apps are able to enable the developer to gain control of the camera, the microphone and sensors, such as the accelerometer, so they can actually do physical surveillance on you, aside from audio and video surveillance, meaning that they know when you're sitting, walking or in transit, as long as you have your device with you.

What types of legislation have been proposed so far?

There's a few in the book, such as CSAM Act,

the Earn-It Act, the Shield Act, the project safe childhood Act,

several of these.

What is being done about this?

- these acts and these bills are being lobbied by lobbyists.

It was a year ago, in March that byteDance CEO show two was also in front of the Congress.

You had the same senators grilling him about TicToc,

fast forward a year later,

TicToc has spent over 100 מיליון,

אולי כמעט 200 מיליון דולרס,

על קמפיינים עדים.

מה זה נראה לי להגיד שאלות הקונגרסטיניות האלה הם באמת איזו תחושה של השקדות,

שבו הם מנסו את ה-CEO'ים בפניהם,

ואז הם אומרים להם שהם יחליטו את הפעמות שלהם וחליטו את העבודה שלהם,

ואז לאחר שהקונגרסטיניות האלה עברו,

ה-checkbooks מתחילים, הלובים מתחילים,

ולעוד פעם,

עוד פעם, זה יחליט של כמעט עשרה שנה או שנייה.

זה מנסור, זה יחליט של עשרה שנים.

הכול יחליט, זה משהו כמעט עכשיו, ואז הם יחליטו בפניהם עוד פעם.

מבחינתי, אנחנו רואים את תימו כל הכבוד בסופרבול שהיה רק לאחרונה, אבל מכיוון כל כך,

מה צריך לעשות כדי למנסור את הפעמות האלה?

יש כבר תחושות על החוקים, ומה צריך להיעשות זה שהממשלה הזו צריכה להיות פושטרות,

ומבחינות החוקות צריכות להיות מאפורסות. זה מה שצריך להיעשות היום.

ריקסלי, תודה רבה לכם על הזמן שלכם.

תודה.

Do you think, though, that around the world, the average voter has almost no stomach to pay for climate scan policies?

There's no question, Tom. There was a poll

released earlier this year in America. I think it was in the spring.

It was an AP NORC poll.

And first they ask, they did it the proper way, right? First they ask, do you believe in climate change, right?

And you know, normal people, I would say, of course, climate change, climate has always changed, right?

When has climate not changed?

And you know, when you tell me that, then we know.

So do you believe in climate change? And most people say, yes, I believe in climate change. Then they ask the follow-up question, if you believe in climate change,

do you believe that humans are causing it?

And that's when you get, actually,

less than half of the population believes that human emissions are causing climate change.

Then they ask another question, which was fascinating.

would you be willing to pay even one additional dollar on your electric bill to fight climate change?

And almost nobody said yes,

including the people who believe the climate change narrative.

And that's the case around the world, right?

And that's Americans who are by all standards around the world,

very, very wealthy still, right?

We have color TV's.

The fact that Americans who believe in the man-made global warming hooks,

would not be willing to pay one single dollar each month to fight climate change.

You know, what about some African or somebody in,

you know,

Southeast Asia who's struggling to put food on the table?

No, they're not going to be willing to pay an extra dollar.

No, they're not going to be willing to prevent development and electrification in their country to prevent climate change.

So they're really beating a dead horse now.

And so they're actually coming back with another approach,

and I've seen this really come to the for over the last few days,

where they're now trying to say climate change is actually a health emergency.

And so, you know, we got to deal with it.

From that approach,

maybe we'll do what we do with COVID for climate.

I don't think that's going to work at all.

Maybe you have a fake?

That's a non-starter, I think, to me, but I guess we'll see what happens.

And I think for most people around the world, too.

I mean, you look at the number, how many people went to go get the latest booster,

what is this booster? 19, 20, 25, I don't even remember anymore.

It was like

25% of the population or something. People are not buying this stuff anymore.

I don't think they're going to succeed on that front either.

They've kind of backed themselves into a corner now with this climate hopes.

I think they're desperately searching for new בוגי-מן,

that might be more frightening.

And I heard somebody at the World Economic Forum recently say, like, maybe we need a water crisis to convince people to give up their freedom?

So, you know, they're going to have to go back to the drawing board, I suspect. I don't think public health,

and I don't think climate change is going to do it,

in terms of convincinging people to surrender יותר זכויות ויותר מלא כסף.

A computer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has been used to look at these problems.

To analyze, to analyze, in broad term, the direction in which our world is headed.

Sponsum

by a group of businessmen and academics, the club of Rome, its conclusion is a revolutionary.

The most important lesson is that we're near the end of the development of society,

which we have been going on for about 2,000 years.

That we reach levels of prosperity which carry the seeds of disruption and

נוססים. It's completely real. תראו את כל הכבוד,

לסביבות הסוציאלית,

לסיגות הישראלית,

בקונפורטים בישראל ולחמודות אחרות.

פרופסור דניס מטוס, בקונפורטים בוושינגטון,

לדמוקרטיה שלו,

שעשייה איכות גדולה כלשהו,

שחביבות גדולה היא חביבות גדולה לדיסה.

הם חייבים, שאם הם לא יכולים לדיסה את הכל,

גם אם הם חייבים גדולה, אין קריאה קריאה,

אבל זה אומר שהאם אנחנו נחתפסים את הרבה יותר.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The Hardline Institute first started to address global warming back in 1993. And back in 1993, we identified that as the mother of all environmental scare tactics.

The environmentalists, the left actually, not environmentalists,

groups on the left

understood that if you can control energy, you can control human beings.

And that's what it was all about.

This was a search for a scientific justification for a political agenda that was set well back in the 19-, I would say, the 1960s and the 1970s.

of course, it goes back to the 1930s, and it goes back probably to the dawn of

human civilization.

But the whole idea is control energy.

And if in fact the combustion of fossil fuels is having a dangerous impact on climate,

you have a recipe

for controlling all use of fossil fuels, that's 80%, 90% of all the energy.

If you can control that and shut it down, you can shut down the engines of the world.

And that is no less than what the environmental movement wants to do, and has been trying to do now,

going on 30 years on the global warming debate.

climate change.

climate change appears to be a lot less about the climate and a whole lot more about the agenda.

You see, climate change is not just skew data on weather,

climate change is a Trojan horse and inside it are the legions of a globalist system

poysed to jump out and share their dreams of communism and absolute state power with all of us.

And we now see that the global powers that be are poise to gain authority to do just that.

Take TEDROS for example,

he is the head of the World Health Organization,

W.H.L.

He is also accused of backing the T.G.R. People's Liberation Front in the Ethiopian Communist Group,

designated as a terrorist organization.

But hey,

what's what's the United Nations, what's what's a terrorist communist anyway?

What really matters here is the new global powers that TEDROS may soon have.

As we speak, the W.H.O. is negotiating a new pandemic treaty.

This would give the W.H.O. and TEDROS in particular the unilateral power to declare global public pandemics and to also craft

responses to them.

It is backed, really, from the United States and from the European Union. They are both standing behind it.

And according to the fellow travelers of the World Economic Economic Forum, under the Accord,

member states have agreed it.

It should be legally binding for those who sign up,

overcoming earlier reservations from the United States, meaning the U.S. is currently backing it.

And of course, the W.H.O. has some skin in the game as well.

Remember back when lockdowns and global mandates were issued around the COVID-19 pandemic?

The W.H.H.O. found itself on top of the world.

For a brief time they, and really just a handful of other global stakeholders and their friends,

were able to call the shots.

They were briefly given near absolute power over humanity.

And when the pandemic was declared over, well, that absolute power was taken away from them.

But soon that may not be the case.

Remember,

it's about public health.

And who does not care about public health?

The W.H.H.O.

And they care about it so much that they're poised to even extend the definition to many other things as well.

Things that you wouldn't immediately think of as being in any way related to pandemics or to global health.

Soon,

their powers could extend to other areas, like controlling global policies on farming,

recommending ways of fighting poverty through global equity,

and of course to manage

And of course, to manage the response of most of the world's nations to that

grand Trojan��רוויזה, climate change.

The style is not what they referred to as one health.

That's the word they used for them.

As EIPAX Times reported,

one health is a broadening of pandemic response to potentially include things like farming,

poverty and climate change,

which could either cause or exacerbate outbrikes,

or impair people's health in other ways.

In other words, it means anything that affects the well-being of humans.

It means everything under the umbrella is going to be within the powers of the World Health Organization,

and the global member states and the so called stakeholders.

The W.H.O. believes, member states will sign the treaty in 2024.

In 1970,

the Sydney morning Herald reported that weather experts fear air pollution,

if unchecked,

will bring on a new ice age.

In 1978, a documentary was made featuring Leonard Nימוי,

of star trek fame,

who told viewers during the lifetime of our grandchildren,

ארקטיק cold and perpetual snow could turn most of the inevitable portions of the planet into a polar desert.

In the late 90's and early 2000,

we were being told that humans had punched a hole in the ozone layer and the sun's ultra-violent rays were going to kill us all.

מנגנזי התואריך התואריך על האנגנות מלחמה המשותפת היא אינתייחס.

הנשיאות הישראלית במדינה משותפת אותם לדקות עוד שנה, אבל בזמן הישראל הנרות הפספת מהקשרות לגלובל בהרבה גלובל של מעמדות.

ובאמת, כמה שנים לפעמים,

גריטה תונגברג הזכירה טרופסט ב-2018 שמסתם

שכן על ידי כך שהאנגנות מלחמה תאריך את כל האנגנות מפסידות במהלך בחודשיים.

הן-הפורסיות, הן-הפורסיות של דום,

פשוט לא נכנסו להיפך.

הפולה-ביארז עכשיו כאן,

המשאה לא נכנסה,

המטר-האוזון-לאט הוא בסדר,

אבל השאלה של המסג'ים הזאת היא לגרות לך נכון. ולמה?

כי אם המטר-הפוקוליפסים של המשחק, אז מדינות מדינות יכולות לצנטרליזות את הכל ולמטרות,

ולמטרות את ההצעות עם המטר-הקטוריה הזאת-קיימנית.

זה טרויגן לגלובליזם,

שהם נמכו בנושאים הבין-לאומיים והמטר-הפארטים שלהם והמטר-הקומוניסטים.

זה לא מוצאה לטרסטים אוסטרליים.

אלה אנטריות לא מוצאות לטרסטים אוסטרליים. הם מנסים לנסות אותנו והם מנסים לתת לנו נפחות,

אבל זו האמצעות האמורית.

האם אתם המטר-הפוקוליפסים בזה?

כי אתם מבחינים מטרסטים קיימניים,

ואתם קוראים הרבה גז גז שלכם.

כן, אני אולי יש את אחד מהגזירות הכי גז גז גז גז של כל מישהו על הפלנט.

אתה יודע,

זה כאילו אני רואה את זה.

אצלנו זה גיגנטי.