חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 674 • רימון הלם... תתפסו מחסה! • 28-02-2023

- - - לא מוגה! - - - 

The legally binding accord is called the zero-draft.

The zero-draft grants the WTO the power to declare and manage a global pandemic emergency.

And once a health emergency is declared,

all signatories of the zero-draft, including the United States,

would submit the authority to the WTO.

So what does this exactly mean?

We speak to the author of the Epoch Times report.

Joining me is Kvind Stoklain, Epoch Times supporter.

Now, Kvind, on this zero-draft document,

just tell us more about, what would it mean for the U.S. if this document were to be ratified?

Yeah, so this zero-draft of the pandemic accord with the HWO,

would basically centralize authority with the HWO during a pandemic. It gives the HW the right to declare when a pandemic is an effect, and once it is an effect,

it gives the HW the right to direct the global response to that pandemic.

And why should we care about this? So what if the HWO has this power?

Yes, so the authorities that it would give to the HWO would be things like, what medicines can be used to treat a pandemic?

So for example,

can we have treatments or are we forced to use vaccines?

They would also have the HWO directing supply chains,

what medicines are available and to whom.

There are also provisions about the HWO controlling misinformation, or what they like to call it,

this information information about this information. So what information gets out there about pandemics and treatments and things like this?

And lastly, there is an element of surveillance.

So it has a global aspect of surveillance that is also directed by the HWO,

how the pandemic is spreading,

who has taken a vaccine, it could include things like vaccine,

passports and things like that.

So essentially, we would have a central power dictating every aspect of how the U.S.

itself to respond to its own pandemic situation.

That's what the disagreement states, yes, is that the HWO would be the central directing authority if the HWO declares a pandemic.

And I understand you wrote an article about this on the Pog Times,

you talked to a number of people,

what do they say about this? What are they telling you?

You know, there's a lot of concern,

I think there's a lot of alarm.

People feel that their personal health treatments שלה שלהם

would be their own concern, it's something that they should be able to determine.

There's been some concern from doctors that don't like the fact that who would be able to dictate what they can prescribe and even what information they could possibly give out.

On the flip side, there are some people that feel like, well, you know, this is never going to pass Congress,

it will be challenged by the courts,

and so this is nothing that we really need to worry about.

How, how is this transition going to happen?

I mean, I totally agree that the world or the way that is built today doesn't make any sense. That is, he's not in line with the אקונומית

powers like אינדיה,

ברזיל or ג'רמניה,

to know that they don't have a massive role in the international or other, but

to me the big question is, so how are we going to go through this

platform? It has to be, it can't be gradual, it has to be driven by a certain shock that will happen.

So now we will reconsider this entire...

So if your question is that this period could be a double-לונד, could have violence, could have conflicts,

we are already living it.

I think the last 5 or 6 years

tell us that we are going through a rather turbulent phase.

We have lost a large part of the human kind of the pandemic because we are all selfish,

we were not willing to share,

we were not willing to use the global institutions to deliverance

to different parts of the world,

we have lost people.

now, how much more bloodshed do we need to understand that the transition is upon us?

היי,

פרידום אהוברס,

זהו דוקטור פיטרסון פיארו עם דוקטורים אמריקה פרוטלין,

מביאים לך את הנושא היום.

אז הנה יש כמה סטטיסטיקות ענייני.

כשאתה לראות את כל מי שהם בקצינתי נגד ה-COVID,

אנשים שהם בקצינים מאשר למה שהם רק לקבוצים את הסרטים הראשונים שלהם,

יש הרבה יותר זכויות שלהם להצליח אינפקטים,

להצליח הופתעים ולמתם.

זה נכון.

אז כשאתה לראות על איזה דאטה

לגבי שני חודשים האחרות של 2022,

במצביעים לאנשים שקיבלו רק את הסרטים האחרונות,

ההצלחה של האינפקטים הגדולה,

ההצלחה של ההוספלציות הגדולה וההצלחה של הטבות הגדולה.

ושלושת המטריקות האלה באמת היו גדולות עד שבו בוסטר הראשון

היו גדולות עבורות ב-2021.

קליפורניה, למשל,

ביוני 2021,

72% מהקבוצים היחידים

נגד ה-COVID היחידים היו גדולים.

באותו חודש, בוורמאט,

90% מהקבוצים ה-COVID היחידים נגד ה-COVID היחידים היו גדולים.

אז בבקשה,

למהבה שלך.

מסתכלים את המדיה, הפרופגנדה,

מסתכלים את הקבוצים.

תדברו על מה שהאווירותים אומרות לך.

אי-אחד לא מעוניין את המהבה שלך.

אתה צריך לקבל את זה למהבה שלך.

אתה צריך לקבל את ההצעות הנכונות הנכונות לבחור לך ולחברות.

הבוסטר האלה לא היו טסטים.

הם לא בסבלות,

הם לא בסבלות,

ובאמת, הם מעלים את האנגלות של המהבה של אינפקטים ללכת מההוספיטה ולמתכם.

ב-2008,

דל, הגיעתי את הפרקציה שלי ומשלתי את הפרקציה אינטגרית פדיאטריקה.

וכ-1,000 אנשים יזכו אותי.

אנחנו הפרקציה של כ-15,000 אנשים עקביים בעוד כמה שנים.

וזה היה בזמן המשך,

Oh, 2016, I wrote the vaccine friendly plan. That's when I created the data set that became the publication published in a peer-review journal.

This Vax-unvaxed study that's based on real-world data of over 3,000 patients.

All,

every single patient born into my practice from the day I opened my door to the day we closed this data set was included.

No exclusions like you see done by the Pharma studies that literally cherry pick up מי הם היו צריכים לראות.

This is every single patient born into the practice.

I was a pro-vaccine doctor, trained mainstream,

and when I started hearing patients telling me, and I started seeing it for myself,

all these medical chronic conditions that are clearly more prevalent in the highly vaccinated,

I thought,

how do we ever get the world to see what I'm seeing?

And what we did to really make sure we were comparing apples to apples was there were 500 and some unvaccinated,

no vaccines at all.

We age matched to those 500 to 500 vaccinated kids.

Now, realize, these are varאבלי vaccinated, they're not CDC schedule vaccinated kids.

Actually, some wise person, it might have been you, I forget who said, why don't you do a quality assurance analysis of your data? I thought, yeah, why don't I?

I mean, in medicine, if you do an intervention,

like any change to what's normally being done,

a really ethical thing to do is to look at the outcome of that intervention.

So that's what we did.

On November 2003 2020,

we published this study in a peer-reviewed journal in Del.

It was rigorously peer-reviewed.

It took months to get it through the process.

But the data that you shared, it's there, it's powerful.

Even in the lighter vaccine schedule,

you see this dramatic difference between all of these illnesses and just those that had this lighter vaccine schedule compared to those that didn't get the vaccines at all.

For eye infections,

way up in the vaccinated,

ear infections,

throat infections,

allergies,

and then you go on down for lung infections,

take it to the whole body, ADD, ADHD, אנימיה,

all significantly increased. I mean, the curves are just astounding.

You'll see on the summary,

the orange curve for those with vaccines just goes up and up and up over the years,

and it's almost flat line for the unvanced.

My unvanced were never ill,

but to see it in a peer-reviewed,

rigorously-reviewed journal article.

The data,

which was blinded and then reviewed and brought to the public,

speaks for itself.

And I want to start with a very sincere apology. I want to, as effusively as I can, fall on my sword.

And I want to explain why and what and frame it. So sit back and enjoy this, if you like this kind of thing.

So, we now know that we have a Pfizer, a very significant Pfizer executive on the record, saying that they knew about these menstrual regularities being a very serious concern.

I have now seen pathological specimens that show excess spike protein in the ovaries,

in the adrenal gland.

We,

the executive,

the executive,

the executive,

in the project Veritas case pointed out that he thought maybe it had something to do with the hypothלמי-פיטויטרי access,

which is a very common,

it's a very delicate cycling system, a neural endocrine system that women have that can get easily set off of them.

But we now know,

some of the possible mechanisms, not just the ovaries,

but also there could be, we've seen access spike protein now in the myelin,

and actually in the neuronal cell wall.

So it could actually be direct neuronal effects.

And we also know that spike protein is affecting Plasiminogen activator inhibitor by inhibiting that inhibitor and causing problems with bleeding and clotting.

And we, of course,

also know now that this spike protein is very much

a part of what we call an endotheliitis or a lining of the artery problem that could easily be manifest in the uterine wall,

in the uterine lining.

So there is at least five mechanisms I can't think of that could be causing this sort of serious concern.

And I am getting

emotional when I want to say this.

When Naomi brought this up, I was the kindest thing I can say as I was dismissive. I was quietly dismissive

of what she was bringing up because I had seen

mental regularities caused by everything in my career. And I thought that's just another thing.

It's just another thing.

I was wrong. I apologize. I got it.

I don't know if we're going to find out exactly what's going on,

but I was I was as wrong as I can be.

And the one thing that this

pandemic has taught me,

well, one of the many things. I've learned a lot of things that I don't want to know. But the one thing that I did want to know is that hubrisis and certainty is the enemy.

You can't be certain about a lot.

And don't don't discount anything until we know for sure what the data is.

We are at the stage now where there is a sort of general agreement that something significant is going on.

There is multiple candidate mechanisms.

And by the way, COVID could be a culprit in this as well, right? I mean, we don't know because they haven't asked the questions.

They have to really,

it's looking like,

based on Dr. Cole's work, who had all the pathology specimens,

it really looks like the vaccine spike, because they're not finding the nucleot-cabסיד

protein in with the spike protein in all these deposits and the ovres and things like that.

So it looks like something that is only delivering a spike,

which is of course the vaccine.

5G radiation exposure intensified and added to by the density of the 5G towers and by the fact that everybody's carrying a smartphone in their pocket and Wi-Fi in their homes and bedrooms.

All of that, the symptoms, the symptoms of radiation illness, the radiation syndrome,

mimic את הסימפטמות של היחסים המשותפים,

mimic את הסימפטמות של היחסים המשותפים,

וממש את הסימפטמות של היחסים המשותפים.

They all are operating on the same six categories of damage in the human body.

And the big ones are immune system dysregulation,

blood clutting,

inflammation, disruption of cellular transmission and disruption of blood cell function, and disruption of blood cell function and neurologic consequences.

So 6 classes of injury to the human body are caused by all 4 of these things that I just mention.

COVID illness, COVID vaccine shots,

5G and the spectrum of radiation.

Electro-magnetic frequency exposure and אמורגי פיברס.

So if you put your common sense hat on it,

and I realize a lot of people have taken it off lately,

but if you put your common sense hat on it,

think about it this way.

Why would the planners of total control unleash משהו שזה שהם יכולים לתת לזה,

Why wouldn't they use an uncontrollable,

terrיפי,

וירוס כמו המורגי פיבור,

מרברג, גיבולה,

all of these ones that you're starting to see leak in the press right now.

Why wouldn't they use that as a fear-mונגרנט טקטיק

to cover up what they do have control over,

which is the whole 5G rollout,

5G density,

what frequencies are turned on and off at any given time.

That's far more controlable than unleashing an unpredictable virus.

So I think people need to be stepping back

thinking about how are the orchestrators,

the planners,

using fear tactics,

based on one thing,

to distract us from what they're doing on the other side with devices that do have more control over them.