חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 878 • מתכון להתאבדות המונית וקניבליזציה • 07-01-2024

- - - לא מוגה! - - - 

אורגניזציה אינסטגרית, עם תקציבים אקסטנטיים לתקציבה הישראלית,

נמצאה להשתמש מיליוני דולרים לאמריקאי קלימט ולגבי אמבירומנטי.

זו תקציבה לתקציבות הישראלית בנושא הישראלית.

ההצלחה העברה על ההצלחות של החינוך בשיחות האנרגי המדיניות.

קריטיקים חושבים שכוונות כאלה יכולים להשתמשות את החינוך המדיניות,

שיוצאות את החינוך בשיחות האנרגי המדיניות לתקציבות לתקציבות האנרגיית.

הגבול,

כמובן כ'אנרגי פאונדאי צ'ינה',

נמצא בקליפורניה, עם המדיניות הבין-לאומית בבייג'ינג.

The organization reportedly contributed 3.8 million dollars to climate initiatives in the U.S.

The receiver of such funds include agencies that engage with the White House on climate policy and advocate facing out fossil fuels and natural gas.

The group has significant ties to the CCP. Its current CEO is a former Chinese official and some key staff members

served in high-ranking roles inside Chinese state agencies and research institutions.

Beyond that,

executives tied to the non-profit frequently meet with Chinese officials and CCP linked institutions reportedly to discuss what they call co-operation between the U.S. and China on climate issues.

According to a 2017 press release from the Chinese regime,

the non-profit CEO at the time said,

the foundation hope to further serve China's going

global national strategy and participate in the work of the built-in road initiative.

As of 2015,

the release stated,

the non-profit had contributed a cumulative 240 million U.S. dollars in grants to China.

The organization receives its funding from private western foundations,

like the MacArthur Foundation,

and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

The revelation comes amid an ongoing congressional probe into the CCP's

growing influence on the U.Chin.

China dominates the green energy market.

The country produces the majority of the world's lithium-ion batteries,

plus the critical minerals that are key to build a electric vehicle.

The Chinese regime has long advocated for international cooperation on climate issues and portrayed

itself as a leader in the global climate initiative.

Though,

critics say,

much of its advocacy remains sleep-servous,

במיוחד כשמדברים על אמצעות קורבן בתחום הבריאות שלהם.

צ'ינה העמידה 27% מהגזים של מדינת ישראל ב-2019,

מעלות האמצעים הקבועות של כל נשים התחילות.

האמצעות קורבן 2% מהאמצעים של מדינת ישראל כל שנה.

המדינת ישראל הייתה האמצע הראשונה הגדולה ב-11%.

בכל זאת, הרגיעון עומד להעמיד עוד פעם נוסעות נוסעות נוסעות נוסעות נוסעות,

יקבלו את האקווולנט של שני עמידים נוסעות נוסעות נוסעות במהלך ב-2022.

צ'ינה' CO2 אמצעים גדולו 10% עוד עוד עוד במהלך הראשונה ב-2023.

Well, I hope you make the most of it, because today is your last day on earth. It's everyone's last day, because it's totally over for humanity. That's, according to the distinguished scientific galaxy brain of גרטה תומבורג, who in a 2018 tweets,

said this top climate scientists is warning, that climate change will wipe out all of humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next 5 years. Well, 5 years have passed, it's June 21st.

I just took a look out the window, and there was a human driving a car, powered by fossil fuels. And now, as far as I can tell,

the humanity hasn't been wiped out.

גרטה deleted her original tweet months ago, but as ever,

the internet never forgets.

So this is not just a one-off prediction that went wrong.

They're always doing this.

They're always saying, Oh, we've only got 5 years, we've only got 10 years. It's just give us more power,

more control.

Just reduce you to live in standards, a little bit more.

And nothing happens.

They're always moving the goalposts by setting the timeline 5 years further on. And then hoping everyone just forgets when they get it spectacularly wrong time and time again.

At best, they have absolutely no idea what they're talking about. And at worse, they're knowingly lying to you. In either of those scenarios,

why are we still listening to them about anything? The Guardian newspaper 2004. European cities will be sunk under rising seas as Britain has plunged into a Siberian climate by 2020.

It doesn't look very סייבריני לי.

I'll go 2009. Optic

אוקטיק סאמארייסט מיוחדים ב-5 שנה. 5 שנה לאחרונה,

ה-Oקטיק סאמארייסט קאפ היה גדול יותר מ-2 שנה לפני זה.

לפחות אנחנו נגידו את ה-1970.

קונסטנט הלום על גלובל אי-סאנג, גלובל קולינג.

לא נכון, ובשביל 15 שנה הם היו אומרים שהם ההחלטה הזאת.

A.O.C. ב-2019.

The world will end in 12 years if climate change is not addressed. But we're already a third of the way through that, and it's not looking to end of the world, is it. It doesn't matter, in 2021, they'll just to extend it again by another 5 שנה.

OK, OK, אבל now,

אם you don't give us more power and control,

the world will definitely end this time.

How many times do they have to embarrass themselves before we stop listening?

How many times do they have to suspend our disbelief before they lose all credibility?

We continue to pay higher prices on everything.

Poor people continue to be lectured about how they're destroying the planet by having children.

כאשר הם continue to gall

It would be one thing if their alarmist garbage was broadcast from a position of authentic humility.

But they do it all while laughing in your face and completely contradיקing all the life style changes they demand being imposed on everyone else.

Let me explain how to explain how this is going to work.

cash will be closed down.

That process is already on the way.

It's no longer accepted for payment everywhere and a previous government tried to ban some cash transactions and even cancel the 100 dollar note.

once everyone is used to a purely digital payment means I can simply flick a switch to move the monetary system to the blockchain.

You will not even know,

until it actually impacts you.

The government could,

theoretically, limit your ability to spend your money in any way they want to.

They also have total control over your money.

So you get a speeding fund.

אה,

why for the check to go?

They can take the cash directly from your account.

What if you go to a meeting for the wrong political cause?

You could have all your money frozen,

for example.

Maybe you put something on social media that's deemed unacceptable.

Well, it could be more than just your Facebook account that's stopped.

A central bank digital currency is the ultimate

tool of control.

They even want you to have a digital ID.

This is kind of like a driver's license for access to the world wide web.

האם אתה מתחיל לראות פטנט כאן?

הגברת אינטרנט אינטרנט אינטרנט אינטרנט אינטרנט אינטרנט אינטרנט בו.

We have all had to take action to slow the spread of COVID-19 and to protect our people.

And as we continue to fight this virus,

we also can't forget that climate change still remains one of the greatest challenges of our time.

And in fact, COVID-19 and the climate crisis have a lot in common.

The general rule of thumb that I believe everybody should adopt

is that if any problem

is being presented as a global crisis,

then it is a scam.

As a global community,

we're challenged by urgent and looming crisis.

When we work together to save lives,

to defeat COVID-19,

when we meet the threat of challenging climate,

the challenging climate we're all feeling already ravaging every part of our world.

That's the idea behind the build back better world.

This global pandemic has also created an opportunity to build back better.

And climate action is an essential part of that.

We can build back

better

from this pandemic by building back green up.

Here we are now with an economy and crisis,

but with an incredible opportunity.

Not just to build back to the world before,

but better,

stronger,

more resilient and more prepared for the challenges that lie ahead.

And there is no more consequential challenge

that we must meet in the next decade

than the on-rushים climate crisis.

Right now,

all of our countries are dealing with the health and economic impacts of the global pandemic.

But as we look to rebuilding from this crisis,

we must do so in a way that we build back better for all of our citizens.

And that must include an ambitious plan to take strong action against climate change.

We want to build back better from the pandemic and I think that this is the right moment

for us all to focus on the other great natural challenge about which we have been warned time and time and time again.

We can't to ignore it.

The warnings have been even clearer than they were for COVID and

that is the problem and that is the problem of climate change.

This pandemic has taught us the importance of global cooperation and we must translate that lesson to how we deal with the climate crisis.

This pandemic reminds us of what we can achieve through collaboration.

We came together,

countries,

communities and neighbors,

to work for our collective safety and well-being.

That's a lesson we need to apply to the climate crisis.

We know now that the next crisis is already waiting for us around the climate crisis and the pattern that we are confronted with

is really the fabrication of global crisis.

The presentation either of non-existent problems or small local problems as being general global crisis.

That fabrication followed by the assertion that the only solutions that are permיסable are global ones that require a global authority,

global control.

That is the general pattern that we are up against.

The COVID policy response was one of those.

Look at what happened to countries like Sweden or Tanzania who tried to push back against the orthodoxy,

the new orthodoxy.

And the climate crisis, the climate change crisis,

is another example

where we are told that the biggest threat to the world is this molecule CO2,

and that an increase in the level of this molecule will cause an increase in temperature and that that temperature increase will be bad for us and that the only thing we can do is consume fewer fossil fuels and less energy.

That's fitting the pattern exactly.

The other, the other things you can observe is instead of presenting science as an ongoing evolving activity, it is presented in terms of

static knowledge,

consensus.

And you see the cancellation and censorship of the dissident voices rather than engagement with them.

These patterns are proof of a scan that is what people need to understand.

When ever something is presented as the science,

as a consensus,

it is a scam.

you do not have to go and get engaged in all of the minutia of the scientific principles and the models and the measurements.

at all.

You can know with absolute certainty that you are dealing with the scam when the descent is suppressed.

There's a lot to talk now in the United States about this green new deal.

I don't know if you have a chance to look at that,

אבל מה are your thoughts?

האם זו איזו הבעיה טובה?

האם אנחנו בטחות?

מה הבנה?

Well, it's a recipe for mass suicide.

It's just quite amazing that someone that is in government,

actually elected to the government of the United States of America,

would propose that we eliminate all fossil fuels in 12 years.

This would basically result,

אם we did it on a global level,

it would result in the decimation of the human population from 7

עוד מיליון down to who knows how few people.

I mean, it would basically begin a process of cannibalization among the human species,

because the food could not be delivered to the stores in the middle of the cities anymore.

How would this, even just that one point,

the point that bothers me the most is if you eliminated fossil fuels,

every tree in the world would be cut for fuel.

There's no other source of heating and cooking once you eliminate fossil fuels.

You can use animal dung, if there were any animals left,

but the animals would all die, too, because,

well, first off, they would all get eaten,

and any that survived would have to go wild, because there would be nobody left to look after them.

I mean, it's the most ridiculous scenario I've ever heard.

People recognize when something is prepוסטרוס,

and I think that's the best word for it.

Well, the best word for it is actually mass suicidal.

But why would anyone vote for something that was going to result in the death of nearly all humans on earth?