חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 453 • זו פסיכוזה המונית! • 23-03-2022

- - - לא מוגה! - - - 

העלייה בתחלואת הקורונה בישראל מאיצה, וכמעט 13,000 מאומתים אובחנו אתמול.

גם מקדם ההדבקה מזנק בהתאם, ועומד כבר על 1.23. אין ספק שהמספרים האלה מטרידים, כי זה אומר שאנחנו בעלייה. אני מניחה שחלק מזה זה ללא ספק ה-BA 2,

שאנחנו יודעים שהוא מדבק אפילו עוד יותר מהאומיקרון.

לא הייתי קוראת לזה מצב אנדמי, אבל בכל מקרה אנחנו כבר בשלב מתקדם במגפה שבה אנחנו יודעים על מה אנחנו מדברים. אז אנחנו יודעים מה דרגת התחלואה. האוכלוסייה מחוסנת ברובה הגדול בשלוש מנות לפחות.

וזה מרגיע אותנו מבחינת הסיכון, עוד פעם, על עומס על בתי החולים, אנחנו נעמוד בו גם אם הוא יעלה.

ולכן אני באמת לא חושבת שמעבר למסכות, זה החיסונים, מי שלא קיבל אותן,

אני לא חושבת שיש משהו נוסף לעשות.

That is mass psychosis.

There is no other explanation.

No reasonable doctor, no reasonable military command, would subject somebody to a second shot of heart damage, which in his case will almost certainly be lethal.

That is what's going on. And I've seen cardiologists after cardiologists of people who sustain heart damage,

recommend more shots to get more heart damage.

דוקטור ארדס אמרתי לכם

שיש איזה פרודקט שהיא תמידה לצורך רנול פלוס ואינגר היפטיקה.

דוקטורים עומדים לתת את הפרודקט,

מנסים יותר גדולות.

יש יותר מ-500 מדינות על גדולות של גדולות. אני אומר לכם, זה מתאר לתת לתת,

בלי תדעות.

זו פסיכוסיה מס.

דוקטורים וסיסטמטריות ואינם כל עצמנו הם אטרנסים

בפסיכוסיה מס.

ההצלחה היא איזשהו איכות להביא אותם אליו בלי

לישון גדולה גדולה יותר ממה שאנחנו כבר רואים.

מה שמתאיס דזמון אמר,

אני הולך לימודות עם הסמינר,

הוא אמר שזה כמעט פשוט ידוע ברכה גדולה גדולה גדולה גדולה.

The autopsy study started to come in this while Patrick of people who were taken the vaccine, and then under one autopsy.

And we could see the fingerprint of the vaccines everywhere in the body,

in the brain, the heart, the bone marrow.

In a paper by Holtgen and colleagues

published just a few months ago in the pre-print service system, the messenger RNA itself stays in the human body for months. He was found in lift tissues and subcanticular tissues. I published papers with Tony Keras from Athens, Greece,

showing that the nucleoside analog caps ought to make that messenger RNA resistant.

And now, Bruce Patterson from InSelDx, and I've had him on the MacAlea report, he's published in the pre-print server,

that the spike protein in the human body, we estimate, after vaccination,

stays in the human body, Patrick,

probably for over a year.

So shot one over a year, shot two over a year,

boosters every six months,

the body is being loaded with a foreign pathogenic protein,

and it's in all the vital organs.

And the CDC has removed tens of thousands of deaths linked to COVID-19,

including nearly a quarter of the deaths of those under 18 years old.

And while many health professionals are taking this as good news,

they're also raising concerns about the reliability of the data.

Here's more on that story.

The CDC,

הגברתי אותך רצעות לתפורע נגד הורים של COVID-19 ילדוי אינסטגרונות בנוסף דאטה טראקר.

שלפחות אותן היו 416 מלכי ילדים מלכי ילדים.

24% מהתפורעי הנגד הילדות הקודם נחשו על הסטטורנות שלכם לפייחס לתפורעי הורים לתפורעי הקודם של קודם על ה-CT,000.

קללי קרונרט,

ג'ורגיה רזונת מוסדת הורים לקיימת הורים לתפורעי הורים של COVID-Data-Tracking

website documented the change in numbers.

On the CDC's tracker website,

the agency says data on deaths were adjusted after resolving a coding logic error.

This resulted in decreased death counts across all demographic categories.

The CDC relies on states and other localities to report COVID-19 deaths and acknowledges that the data is not complete.

yet, the statistics are often cited by those advocating for vaccination against COVID-19,

including by CDC director Dr. ראשל וולנסקי,

when she pushed for an expert panel to advise the CDC to recommend the vaccine for all 5 to 11 year olds.

In an email to the Epoic Times,

קרונרט said,

The update is an improvement,

but it's at least the third correction to this data and still does not solve the issue.

It just highlights that people have been using a flawed source of data when discussing kids and COVID-19.

A number of medical professionals responded positively to the child death count being cut by almost a quarter,

but raised concerns that the data is being used widely to guide and advocate for policy.

Dear Andy,

It is approximately one year since

I shared with you my rapid review of the evidence on Iveramקטן for COVID. With one year since my video addressed to our Prime Minister,

בוריס ג'ונסון,

advising him that we had a safe and effective medicine to beat the pandemic.

And one year, since you and I met

to discuss working together to get Iveramקטן approved as soon as possible.

Early in January 2021,

we shared data and agreed that Iveramקטן looked like a cheap,

safe and effective way to end the pandemic,

that it needed to be rolled out as soon as possible.

We agreed that working together would facilitate this and you joined us,

strong-wותר-team,

preparing to conduct a co-conse systematic review.

Before we could collaborate, however,

you published your paper as a pre-print.

I will never forget reading this paper for the first time.

You reported that Iveramקטן was associated with reduced inflammation,

fast-to-viral clearance.

Iveramקטן showed significantly shorter duration of hospitalization and in module severe infection there was a 75% reduction and death with favorable

clinical recovery and reduced hospitalization.

Incredible!

In a time when hospitals were overflowing,

people were being locked down to prevent viral transmission and the death count was rising.

Here we had a safe established of patent medicine that could reduce hospitalization,

viral transmission and deaths.

The total conclusions were that Iveramקטן should be validated in larger,

appropriately controlled,

randomized trials before the results are sufficient

and for review by regulatory authorities.

People were dying.

We were told that hospitals were overflowing.

We had a safe old medicine that could help.

It's a called for more trials.

On the 17th of January 2021,

I wrote to you

asking you to retract your paper,

saying that it would cause a miserable harm.

We met on zoom the next day.

And who are dying today who don't need to die because there's either of them.

There are a lot, as I said, there are a lot of different opinions about this. As I said, some people... We are looking at the data, it doesn't matter what what other people say.

We are the ones who are tossed with the...

and we have the experience to look at the data and we assure everybody

that this cheap and effective treatment will save lives.

It's clear.

You don't have to say we're so much this and so much this is that.

It's absolutely crystal clear.

We can save lives today if we can get the government to buy out of the next time.

Your manuscript appeared rushed to me and its methodology was substandard.

I made no bones about what I thought about it.

And I was not the only one along,

but the poor quality and conclusions of your paper.

Dr.

Dr. קורי ו-Dr. מריק עשו אתכם ושאלו אתכם לתת אתכם את החלטות.

An independent forensic communication specialist has since confirmed

שיש שתיים או שלושות אחרות במיוחדות האחרונות האלה ביחדות לתת את המחקרות האחרונות האלה.

Why did you let them influence?

Who's conclusions are those on the review that you've done?

Who's not invested as an author who's actually contributed?

Well, I mean,

I don't really want to get into it. I mean, the... I think it is to be clear.

I would like to know

who are these other voices that are in your paper

that are not acknowledged.

אז יוניטייד have a say, do they influence what you write? יוניטייד has a say in the conclusion,

the paper.

אוקיי.

אז מי זה יוניטייד, אז,

מי זה יוניטייד, אז, מי משתמש לתת אתכם על ההבדלים שלכם?

זה רק אלה אנשים שם, אני לא משחררת מיוחדות האלה.

זה יוניטייד, זה לא יוניטייד.

אז הם יוניטייד במיוחדות האלה.

כן.

You criticized studies from other countries for not being peer reviewed or published.

The irony being that your manuscript was not a peer reviewed,

no published at that time,

and it's had a profound impact

on people's lives.

Indeed,

כשאנחנו נותנים לנו את ההצעה המתנהלת על אברה מקטן למערכת מדינות אחרותיות,

אנחנו אמרו שהצעה של דוקטור אנדרו הילס אומרת שההבדלים על אברה מקטן היא לא מספיקה,

ושיותר תוצאות יותר נוספים.

הוא היה בטוח מאוד בשנואר 2021,

כשאתה נותן את המחקרות על המחקרות במחקרות האנשים ובחירות האלה.

תודה רבה, אני לא יכול לתת לך שזה יחזור בזמן הרבה זמן.

I'm not saying we keep going for the year.

But the fact that you're saying you're not going to get a loss for long time, next to you realize the impact of your work.

So how long are you going to let people carry on time unnecessary?

Up to you.

What is the timeline that you've allowed to listen in?

Well, I think then it goes to WMHO,

the NRIH,

the FDA and the EMEA,

and they've got to decide

when they think enough is enough.

And how do they decide?

Because there's no one that's not

to give them good evidence, because yours is certainly not good. Well, when yours comes out, which will be in the very near future,

at the same time there will be other trials producing results which will

nail it with a bit of luck and they will be there. This is already nailed.

But what I hope is that this tail-mode that we're in doesn't last for a long time. It lasts הרבה שנים,

and I guarantee I will push for this to last for a short amount of time as possible.

So how long, how long do you think the stalemate will go on for it? How long do you think you

you...

Well, OK. From my side of my side,

OK. From my side,

every single new trial that comes through

we're going to be

אגרסיבית adding it on and I think that end of that

we'll be there.

6 חודשים.

How many people are by every day? Well, there is a whole group of people who think that I've never met. This is completely rubbish. I'm not talking about them. I'm not talking about them. I'm saying, we know the evidence.

How many people time they...

Oh, sure. I mean, you know,

15,000 people a day. 15,000 people a day time 6 weeks?

Yeah,

בסדר. No, אני מבין את זה. If I can't get it into the U.K. Because of this rate, all other countries are getting out to the next year. Why is the all this to get the drug approved and to do everything I can to do everything I can't do everything you can. Because everything you can, we're both saying to those people who pay you and I can see this preventions death.

So I'm not going to support this conclusion anymore and I'm going to tell the truth.

כמובן שהם לא עשו עם זה כלום ולא ישחררו את האיבר מקטין כי אז ביליאד דבילי יפסיד את כל הכסף

וכל השותפים שלו זה אלה שמדברים ומבקשים מהם שיבדקו.

אז מי יבדוק בחייאת? הנה, עברו כבר למעלה מחצי שנה ושום דבר לא השתנה ולא תמצאו איבר מקטין

בקופות החולים ובכל המקומות ברוב העולם.

ככה זה עובד כי רוצים שימותו אנשים

ושרבי כפר מה ירוויח ותלכו לעזאזל מבחינתם

וככה הם רוצים להכניס לכם זריקות בשביל כסף.

אבל הבעיה שזה זריקות מבט,

מילא אם זה היה פלצבו,

ניחא.

זה לא פלצבו.

זה לא כמו של ביבי דיקי המחריד.

ביי.

ביי.