חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 923 • החיסון הגן על תעשיית הנשק הביולוגי • 11-03-2024

- - - לא מוגה! - - - 

‫‫‫‫‫

‫תודה לכם על העברת ושרחקת ‫הכחה על אחד ואנשי. ‫היום אני מדברת על האנשים ‫מהלך של הורדות ‫בשביל דאט בסדר. ‫העמלות של פרמקו-ינג' ל-VAR's ‫בסדר.

‫אנאליסת של הוורדות ‫בשביל הדאט בסדר ‫בשביל דאט בסדר בקונטקסט ‫הורדות הורדות ‫הורדות סיכנלות מיוצרי אמורג'תית ‫שכלי מיוקרדיציה לתפופול,

‫שהיא לא תוכלת לרשת הדאט.

זה עומד על פרוצדות סטנדרטיות ומבקש את השאלה,

למה הטבעים הם נמצאים?

קריטרייה ברדפורט-היל משתמשותים במדיניות בדיניות אפידמיולוגיות,

כמו הסיסטמא הווירוס פרמקו-ויג'לנט סיסטמבר.

קריטרייה פרופורציונלית משתמשותית להשתמשות אם לא

נמצא מסתדר או לא נמצא יותר מעומד בקונטקסט של דרוג כלשהו.

אם ה-PRR הוא יותר מאחורי אחד,

נאמן חוצפה קיימצת אותה.

בעת,

ההסדמנות על מלחמות ה-PRR בקונטקסט של קולוציונס קיימנטס,

בדיניות המדיניות עקבות עקבות עד ה-RRR הוא 3.6. בעת,

מספר מספר הנאמן החלטו של מלחמות יחסית למלחמות ב-2011

היה 634. ביום מגיעי החדשיות היסטורית,

זה היה ספציה כסגל שלא רק כדי להשתמשות

and investigation, but to shut down the rollout of the COVID-19 shots.

Fact,

in 1999,

a roto-virus vaccine designed to prevent roto-virus gastroenteritis was pulled from the market due to an intususception signal emanating from varres,

which comprised 584 cases.

Question,

אם 584 cases of intusususception were enough to prompt product removal,

אז למה לא 634 cases of death not enough to prompt COVID-19 product removal?

Fact,

ה-data early death count was hidden.

Fact,

עכשיו 1,615,998 רפורטים על adverse events have been successfully filed to varres in the context of the COVID-19 injectable products,

with a staggering 1,013,442 רפורטים ב-2021 alone,

when considering both the foreign and domestic data sets.

The number of adverse events reported to the domestic VARS data set for all vaccines combined has been, on average, 39,000 in total per year and has been very slowly and steadily increasing in direct proportion to the increasing number of vaccine products on the market.

see slide 1. In 2021,

however, a 1417% increase in reporting,

where by 93% of these reports were in the context of the COVID-19 products.

Fact,

age is not deterministic for adverse event reporting.

Since administration of the COVID-19 products to the 0 to 4 age group commenced,

the rate of adverse event reporting has been increasing faster than for any other age group.

Fact,

the argument that the spike in reporting is spike protein,

the spike in reporting is due to increased shot administration is false.

סעיפים 2 פה נכסף מה לעניין אותם,

לדוגמה מדינות העמלתיים,

לפי

ה-36% מהסרבות בעומדים הראשונים בחרף שלON

הניסווי להשויזה בינואנשי ה-19 ו-2021 שוקלו,

ולחבידותי הטובות הטובות הטובות העמל

באיזה טוב בעומדים.

קודם בשamות הניסווי את התרבות ה-3460,

The Bradford Hill criterion reversibility is satisfied.

When a drug is withdrawn, the side effects disappear.

A strong correlation of R-Equals point 8 and a high co-variance exists between shot rollout data and myocarditis reports filed according to our world in data, new vaccination data and various data respectively.

As shot demand wanes, so do myocarditis reports see slide 3a. Fact,

the Bradford Hill criterion specificity is satisfied. A very specific population at a specific site and disease is reported with no other likely explanation.

Dose 2 is associated with a four fold increase in reporting of myocarditis in 15 year old boys.

This indicates specificity with regard to age and gender.

see slide 3b. Fact, the Bradford Hill criterion,

dose response is satisfied.

Greater exposure leads to greater incidence of the effect.

following Dose 2,

an increase in signal occurs, see slide 3b. Fact,

מיוקרדיטיס is not transient or mild.

A new paper published by Rose at All in the journal therapeutic advances in drug safety shows that

מיוקרדיטיס is associated with hospitalization in 76% of the reports.

There are seven more Bradford Hill criteria that are satisfied.

That's a 10 out of 10, בינגו.

In conclusion,

standard operating procedures for analysis of safety signals emergent from VARES,

when utilized,

reveal causal links between the COVID-19 injectable products and the adversive events investigated.

Standard operating procedures are not being followed by the owners of the data, namely CDC,

HHS and FDA,

and this equates to hiding the millions of people reporting not only adversive events,

but injuries in the context of the COVID-19 injectable products.

Thank you.

דעתי.

דעת רוז, אני לא דעתי,

אז כשאתה מדבר על האינסטגנציה

לתוצאות הירוטובירוס,

מה הייתה הקבוצה שהייתה

שאתה מתחילים לתאר האחרות של הבחירות בקורת ה-COVID-19?

אינטוסספציה. אינטוסספציה. היא מתחילה מעל הבעל,

אז זה כאילו דירקטורי לתוצאות כלפי הבחירות של הבחירות.

אז עוד פעם, סירוס אטוריס הוא אינטגנציה, אבל לא מתאר האחרות.

לא,

אז כמה אינסטגנציות האלה היו?

600. עכשיו אנחנו עד לפני כמעט 37,000 אנשים במקומות עבורות.

עם ה-COVID-19,

24.4% מהאנשים מתקרבים על ידי ההצעה הזאת ועל שני דיון או שני דיון.

כן.

משהו לראות פה, נכון?

I'm talking today about what I consider the crushingly obsessive push to COVID vaccinate every living person on the planet.

So we all know,

circumstantial,

at least,

that the virus that leet from the Wuhan Institute of Vrology in fall 2019,

the initial cases paralleled the Wuhan subway line 2,

which passes by the WID.

הווירוס מתחיל 19 נוקליוטייד גנטי סיכוונסטי,

שגם נמצא במדרנה פטנטים מ-2017 ובספר ביולוגי וספי אינטליגנציה

נמצאים מידי סיכוונסטי,

שבהתארגלית משמעותית את ה-WIV כחלק מהחלקה של הלחלקה.

אז הווירוס, ה-COVID-19 פנדמי,

נמצא בגלל שהיה ביו-אנג'ינרת.

ה-WIV התחילה את ראלף ברקס גנטיין

מטכנולוגיה של הטכנולוגיה אינסקרית ב-BSL-2.

אז זה היה עבוד רעיון בווירוס,

שהייתה ב-NIH

עבור הדארף ב-Dשארק אקו-האנגלית מיוחדת החינוך,

וכן ב-DOD ו-USAID גרנטים.

עכשיו,

עבוד רעיון וביולוגיה היו מה שאני חושבים להיות הפרוט של האינטליגנציה שלנו,

שהייתה מוצעת סקרית ונפלאית ביולוגית ביולוגית לפני 70 שנה.

ההכניסה של האחרונה האחרונה או האמוניתית להגיד

של אינפקטיין ומתחילה לגבי מיוחדת גדולות של האנטליה

הועברה לתחילת הביו-אנג'ינות של 1975,

שפרסיד פורד.

המשמעותית לתחילת ביואנגלית ביואנגלית.

אגב,

הלופה האחד של המשמעותית היא שקטות מוצעים קטנים של ביואנגליות

ניתן להגיד

כדי לקרות מסדר מספר במיוחדת ראשונה.

עכשיו,

המשמעותית הזאת

הייתה אז קצתה במיוחדת הביואנגלית לפני 50 שנה.

המשמעותית הביואנגלית ביואנגלית ביואנגלית

לאחרים שיגדלו את התחילת הבטלות של אצלם,

כלומרים דואל-אחרים,

or dual-use research.

And this was the premise and motivation of the various וירולוגי גנט applications,

like Dfuse and so on, submitted to DOD and NIH funders.

This was the permitted rationale for the development of offensive biomemins

in that it would lead to work on vaccine countermeasures.

Now fast forward to 2019.

Many billions of dollars spent on the biomemins industry over the past

decades for all this work on offensive biomemins,

where are the successful commercial vaccines to show for it?

So there's been lots of vaccine research that's been carried out for known harmful organisms,

but minimally, if at all,

for these gain of function agents of the biomemins.

And for COVID, it took a year of shotty research

to produce and test the first batch of commercial vaccines for SARS-CoV-2.

And how is a year delay even remotely acceptable for a military defense against a biomemins that spread across populations in weeks?

A year to develop a vaccine for pandemics that occur in waves in weeks.

And these vaccines are supposed to be deployed before a pandemic occurs,

not in the middle of one.

So my hypothesis, what I believe,

is that both the virus origin cover up

and the forced vaccination of the entire planet were orchestrated

to protect the integrity of the Bio-Weapon's Industry.

once the general public understood the reckless and cavalier behavior of this industry,

that it operated under a false and misrepresented pretense of vaccine development that has never been

successful commercially realized,

it would then clamber to shut down the industry.

And so the suppression of knowledge of theindustry's

reckless involvement in the Wuhan leak is an obvious cover up.

We have proof of that cover up from the POIA documents involving Faucii-Colins,

ג'רמי פרארה and others.

And my conclusion then is the reason why the whole population had to be vaccinated

is to show that the Bio-weapons industry supposedly did have a rationale

of vaccine development as part of its claimed dual use research.

The vaccines then are the evidence that the Bio-weapons

industry was properly justified from the beginning.

Without a successful vaccine to show for itself, in the time of the pandemic crisis,

especially one caused by a leak from a Bio-Weapons Industry source itself,

it would be clear to everyone that the rationale for theindustry's existence was a fraud in the first place.

And so the COVID vaccines themself supplied the defense

against the charge that the Bio-weapons industry was not actually dual use.

But it was offensive to the 1975. So the vaccines had to be dramatically pushed out

to be the universal solution to show that the Bio-weapons industry was actually working for the public good.

And in this context

it did not matter what collateral damage the vaccines cost.

All there had to be was the public thinking,

public thought of this theater,

that the industry had been doing its work to produce usable vaccines,

not offensive Bio-weapons.

Thank you, Dr. ריש.

So the rationale, of course,

of the Bio-industry there is that if others are developing

Bio-weapons,

don't we need counter measures in order to develop counter-weets,

we need to create a limited quantity of Bio-weapons.

I mean, can you can you just address that justification?

Well, this goes to my sarcastic comment about

disproportionality, that from a military perspective,

if if one is attacked by a Bio-weapons agent,

then why would one have to respond with the Bio-weapons agent?

One could respond with economic warfare, conventional weapons,

chemical weapons, nuclear weapons, if it was that bad,

that we have at our disposal

a whole range of responses.

And to launch an un-tested bio-weapon as a response,

where we might not even be able to protect ourselves from blow-back

from that agent,

it's, to me it's insane that there's no rational reason.

There's a very interesting chart in Robert F. Candy's new book, The Wuhan Cover-up.

And we were all,

I talked about Fauci's e-mails, where he funded

את פיטר דאסקס,

Eco-Health Alliance, לטונות של כ-15-16 מיליון דולרס.

What I did not realize is that the Department of Defense

funded Eco-Health Alliance לטונות של 42 מיליון דולרס,

and USAID,

which

RFK ג'וניור אומר, זה כמעט C.I.A. קאט-או, אני לא אסביר את זה,

לטונות של 53.6 מיליון דולרס.

So it kind of

confirms מה שאתה מדבר עליו, במה שהייתה היחידה.

One countermeas you didn't mention,

but the way we met was in 2020 talking about early treatment.

As long as it's an MPD and I'll just, can you talk about that fact?

I mean, we relied everything on vaccines for the reasons that you've assumed,

but just going along with that was the sabotage of early treatment.

Well, during the time of the suppression of early treatment,

I drugstקלורקמן, and later I RrMIT,

and I thought it was to protect the marketplace for the vaccines,

other medications or the vaccines that would eventually come out.

But now, given what I said, I think the suppression was that

if those medications solved the pandemic,

then the vaccines wouldn't have been needed, and then the bio-weapons would come back in force and there would be no rationale that the vaccines were the end product of the offensive

of bio-weapons research.

So they had to be suppressed for the same reason.

So again, you've come up with an assumption,

based on the fact that

so much that's happened,

hasn't made any sense whatsoever. And I've heard that time in time again from people fighting the medical freedom of the movement. It's just like,

this thing,

no, this makes sense,

so you'll start coming up with different theories.

That is true.

I mean, I haven't been inside the room,

anywhere, where they told me all this,

but there's very little that make sense.

And you have to think,

if you were doing this work,

and you know you're the CIA or you're the W.H.O. or whoever has been pulling the puppet strings that you're going to look really bad when stuff that you've done that is kind of נפארית,

but you've gotten away with it and suddenly comes into public view,

and now the public's saying,

you know, but we weren't supposed to be doing this in the first place,

and look at the damage that this has caused because you couldn't contain it.

You promise you would contain it at the worse that you didn't contain it.

And you need to protect your billion dollars,

worth of grants and funding that you get every year as well.

OK. That's right. Thank you, Dr. Rish.