חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 941 • סתמו ת'פה! - חלק א' • 08-04-2024

- - - לא מוגה! - - - 

that artificial intelligence could replace jobs and increase in equality.

It's new report came out right before the World Economic Forum's annual meeting where business and political leaders are gathering this week in Davos, Switzerland.

The IMF says advanced economies,

such as the United States, will be affected the most by AI.

These nations have more jobs with cognitive based tasks and have the money and infrastructure to widely use AI.

In these countries,

the IMF says that almost 60% of the workers could be impacted.

I hope that is literally everyone who uses a computer or touches a computer at any point during the day.

בוב רג'רס is the CEO of O.I.I.A.I. which uses AI to solve supply chain problems.

רג'רס אומר שזה רק certain jobs that are being replaced and that he currently doesn't see it happening across the board.

הוא רואה הרבה אנשים שבחרות מהAI בשלבות האחרונות של חברי הכנסת שיוצאים לבחון דרוג.

2 חודשיים של חברי הכנסת לשנות קנדידי כסף יכולים לראות כמה שנים של חברי הכנסת,

כאשר החרד של חברי הכנסת שתהיה רגע במיוחד שאינות קיימתי כסף חברי הכנסת ודטאטאפסי אחר.

אז כשאתה חושב על זה,

That chemist is not going to be replaced simply because they were able to compress two weeks of work.

The IMF warns that any quality will grow because not everyone will benefit from AI.

It says this could lead to political instability.

It says, world government should be proactive by implementing comprehensive social safety nets like re-training workers,

implementing policies that promote fair access to AI and co-operating internationally.

This is Dave Martin for NTD News.

As trust in governments around the world continues to decline,

many of them are attempting to maintain control by clamping down on misinformation and disinformation,

also known as truths they don't like.

A recent hearing by the sub-committee on the weaponization of the federal government

reveals just how far some governments are about to go to clamp down on descent,

and it is frankly scary.

That's why today we're going to summarize what we said and

tell you what you can do to fight back against the incoming online censorship.

This is a video you don't want to miss.

Let's start with a quick bit of background.

What you heard in the introduction is correct.

There is a political committee on Capital Hill that's dedicated to analyzing the weaponization of the government.

It was established in January last year and it's safe to say that it's been controversial.

That's mainly because most of the sub-committee's hearings have focused

on criticizing the current administration's use of government powers.

This has resulted in mostly partisan talking points,

which honestly are not worth covering.

The actual contents of these hearings,

however,

are certainly.

Case in point,

the hearing we'll be summarizing today is about,

The federal government's role in funding the development of AI-powered censorship and propaganda tools that can be used by governments and big tech to monitor and censor speech at scale.

Now, to our understanding,

this hearing was organized because of a bombshell report published by the Daily Caller last February,

which found that the national science foundation,

or NSF,

an independent U.S. government agency,

had invested 40 million dollars into developing tools for online censorship.

קייטלין ריצ'דסון,

the journalist who wrote the report,

believes that the U.S. government is in the process of putting together a so called

censorship industrial complex by funding this and other AI research.

FYI,

other governments around the world are basically in the process of doing the same.

More about all the online censorship laws being passed around the world,

in the description.

moving on.

Now,

as you might have guessed,

קייטלין was one of the four people who testified.

The other three were גרג לוקיאנוב,

the President and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression,

or FIHR,

לי פאנג,

an investigative journalist who worked on the infamous Twitter files which revealed how big tech was

coordinating with governments to censor descent,

and Norman Eisen, a former U.S. ambassador.

It's important to reiterate that while the motivations for this hearing were likely partisan,

the facts that were revealed are something you need to know regardless of your political leanings or location.

We are fundamentally dealing with powerful tools that could be used by any administration or government.

So,

while you may cheer the use of these tools against people you dislike today,

know that they could someday be used against you too.

And if you think that's fine because you consider yourself non-parthezן,

think again.

History suggests that the use of these powerful tools tends to go to the extreme.

And some would say,

we're already living in this kind of world.

Yes, the year 1964 has begun.

And to commemorate the new year,

we ask some young people how they think the future will look in 60 years time.

What will the world be like in the year 2024?

There will be so many people, but they have to have an overflow into the sea.

I think whenever we have a question,

we'll just ask the computer and it will tell us the answer.

everyone will have their own flying car and they'll just be flying around,

all over the place.

Well, maybe it's a funeral of a computer.

I don't think they'll be politicians or anything like that. I think they'll be monkeys and they'll be in charge.

Yes, I think the coin bureau deals page will be the place where all the best deals in crypto can be found.

No doubt about it. It'll be absolutely

fantastic.

Because there will be more kills

for the diseases and not so many people will get sick.

Anyone who's got any sense will steal their money on their own hardware device,

when no one will be able to get it.

And I'll use the coin bureau page to get the best discounts on those devices.

All dogs and cats will probably be robots by then and you won't have to take them to the vet or or anything,

really.

I think when you sign up to an exchange on the coin bureau deals page,

you'll get discounts on trade and fees up to 60%.

It'll be lovely.

I expect they will set aside

parts of the country,

so only for recreation.

One day, the coin bureau deals page will offer up to 50,000 dollars in sign-up bonuses

on some of the best crypto currency exchanges.

I can't wait. I really can't.

It'll be splendid.

So, there you have it.

The year 2024 is going to be quite incredible by all accounts.

The future's bright,

the future's coin bureau.

This is nothing you can't do to stop it.

Now, the hearing began, as all hearings do,

and that was with opening statements from politicians on both sides of the aisle.

The first to speak was Jim Jordan.

He started by listing all the times that the U.S. government had coordinated with big tech to censor otherwise legal speech.

It was a long-old list.

He then cited a recent bombshell report which found that the U.S.

government had even been pressuring Amazon to effectively ban certain books on its platform during the pandemic.

ג'ים עוד מעטים שאלות החוקים האלה היו עולים לגבי ג'נרטיב AI,

שבאמת הגיעו את המדינות בקרייתם.

הוא פשוט איתך כמה קוראים מהסיסוחים של המחלקה המקומה המדינות בישראל.

אלה היו קוראים קוראים על איך שהם יכולים לצייחות לגבי אמנה סביבות לגבי העשויים,

כי זה יהיה פרוגמה שהיא תהיה לפייחת עבודה בעבודה,

לא שכחת לגבי אמנה סביבה.

The most damming quote, however, was about how some of these studies are specifically looking to target minorities and those who live in rural areas with their online censorship tools.

This is because both groups tend to believe in something higher than the government's authority,

which is a problem.

And that's not all.

ג'ים then revealed that some of these tools are working on proactive censorship.

In other words,

what you say online will already be censored before you can even finish typing it.

These are the kinds of ideas that have been actively discussed at the World Economic Forum's Annual conferences.

And you can find our summary of the most recent Weth Conference using the link in the description.

Moving on.

Now, the second politician to speak was Stacey Plaskin.

She dismissed everything what Jim said as a conspiracy theory.

She said that she was frustrated that they were discussing this topic for the sixth time and said that the real weaponization of the government happened during the previous administration.

So with all the partisan talking points supposedly out of the way,

the witnesses gave their own opening testimonies.

קייטלין was the first to speak.

After arguing that the U.S. government is creating a censorship industrial complex,

she revealed that many of the censorship studies,

she discovered last year are still ongoing.

If you're wondering why קייטלין believes a censorship industrial complex is being made,

she explained that it's because it's becoming a sort of emerging industry that's being heavily funded by governments.

And this reminded us of the growing crypto compliance industry,

whose purpose is to appease the Financial action task force.

To her credit,

קייטלין said that she's confronted these institutions about their research.

They proceeded to launch a marketing campaign,

claiming that the censorship research was being done in the name of

protecting democracy.

And that seems to be a popular excuse for government overreach these days.

Anyway, the second witness to speak was לי.

He explained that AI can allow for censorship at an unprecedented scale.

He went on to recount his findings when he worked on the Twitter files,

notably the collaboration between Big Pharma and the organizations which helped Big Tech censor information online.

What's crazy is that לי revealed that these initiatives had been set aside after

that the pandemic that the pandemic ended, but have come back as of last summer, make of that what you will.

לי אז אמרתי שכמה מהערכים שהיו אורגנציות שהיו אורגנציות

אורגנציות מלחמת טרוריסטים עכשיו יהיו עובדים עכשיו לישראל שלהם.

הוא אמרתי שהערכים האלה יהיו עובדים על מי שיש במה שיש במה שיש במה שיש במה שיש במה שלהם ושיבחן את החברתם שלהם ושיבחן על החברת החברה להיות לא-פרטיזנית.

עכשיו, הלקריאה השלישה השלישה היה גרג.

הוא אמרתי שהFIA עקיבת את האינפוריגיה של מדינת ישראל בלבד בריאות הכנסת,

ושהוא עשה את זה גם לישראל ולישראל.

הוא אמרתי שהחברות שהם עשויים עכשיו יצאו במה שיש במה שיש במה שיש במה שיש בו עם AI.

הוא עמוק על העניין של האינפוריגיה כלכלית

AI-Alignment,

שהשאירים בידיאו שלנו על צאט-GPT.

עכשיו, בתיאוריה,

Alignment is supposed to be about teaching AI to do what you want it to do.

In practice, however,

it often involves teaching AI to act in accordance with whatever the government wants it to do.

However,

גרג stressed ש-AI is just another tool,

and that means that it can be used to expand freedom of speech,

just like the Internet did.

He said that the Internet and AI are analogous to the printing press,

which famously brought about the end of religious control over governments.

אבל, of course,

גרג stresseded that this is only true if AI is allowed to evolve in a free and de-centralized way.

Too much regulation will result in unwanted consequences,

such as censorship,

and also risks setting back the United States' competitiveness on the technology front.

Can't forget about that one.

And finally, it was Norman's turn to speak,

and as is often the case with these hearings,

he was partisan to the point that he was practically pounding the table.

Notably, he said that everyone next to him was crying wolf,

and argued that it's OK for the government to be working with big tech and AI companies on stuff.

He then went one step further by arguing that the government is also,

quote,

allowed to make its concerns known to big tech and is allowed to fund any kind of AI stuff it pleases.

He then announced that he's currently offering a scholarship to those wanting to explore AI and democracy.

With the opening statements out of the way,

the question period began.

The first to ask questions was Thomas Massy.

He asked לי about the U.S. government's AI censorship programs.

לי revealed something insane,

that he's discovered that he's discovered a program which involves the creation of AIBots on social media that will argue with people the government says are spreading misinformation and disinformation.

So if you said something on social media that your government doesn't like and got

spammed with a bunch of replies from strange looking accounts,

well,

the chances are it was government funded AIBots.

שר המשפטים שלנו היא איך אפשרות לתת את זה לנהיגות עם רצות היות שעות לנהיגות המשפטים.